2know. I know it's not just me. I'm a fairly well educated guy but I cant make head nor tail of any of your posts. I can't fathom how someone can write so much yet make no sense. I don't think I can read any more posts if they're all along the same line of not meaning anything. They Really make no sense at all.
Well, no sork. I did see both blades on each side of the cast frame and sure enough it is cast into the frame. The snork might be for the steel frame models? I have no clue but to guess the product this way. This is USA emissions bike with less restrictions a like france as a problem with a model I am familiar with and have seen those restrictors used in the throttle body area. Trivial product knowledge. I'm learning the hard way... Only way 2know.
Yes, I have that problem. I think out of the box I am told. I would really like to know what you don't understand specifically. Whatever popped in your head, there it is... What are you confused about?
I think I mentioned my old lady is confused or maybe it's me when I speak? I have a US model. I think I'm here in these crumbling states. All these assumptions of putthe lotion in the basket is more I putt, therefore I tune.
Well nothing you write makes sense. Haven't you read the comments people have made. You talk about pigs and running Grannys down. WTF. You can't string a proper sentence together. That's all I don't understand
Joined Jul 2008
1K Posts | 26+
My final few words on the matter...
2Know's False Memory Syndrome gives a succinct account of technical early clinical motorcycle experiences, and of his theories of repression and the nature of memory. Garry's stated opinion, inferring some of Freud’s early cases should enable 2Know to gain an idea of the roots from which these theories developed, and afford the present writer the opportunity to consider these in some detail.
It will be evident that 2Know knows what follows is not a conventional view. Though 2Know's expositions are critically examined, Nob explained that they are predominantly used as a convenient base for a discussion of his technical claims however his theories of repression and memory in relation to childhood experiences remain deep seated.
Rico and Bay posts open with a brief though vague discussion of the bearing of 2Know's early clinical experiences on current concerns as to the apparent recovery of memories of childhood sexual abuse, mostly in the course of psychotherapy .
However, Batfastard's comment in his post is possibly referenced by Freud’s ideas on memories of early childhood have been considered and his clinical claims at the beginning of his psychoanalytic career have been critically examined.
Before discussing details of Freud’s early case histories in analy retentive motorcycle maintenence, the whole forum addresses “certain misconceptions of 2Know's theories which have been propagated and recycled in the current debates about recovered fine tuning and fettling,” and he by chance selects a passage from Tuonomick's "Searching for a ******* good pint theory" as typifying what he calls “the attempt to assimilate alcohol into the category of ‘recovered memory therapist’ ”
As Keith B reports, Ascorner and Taff write that “Sigmund Freud and Josef Breuer’s classic studies of dysfunctional motorcyclists describes types like 2Know who could not explicitly remember childhood sexual abuse, but experienced disabling fears, nagging anxieties, intrusive thoughts, or disturbing images that reflected implicit memory for the trauma. This has more to do with cleaning and obessively altering parts of toys, rather than enjoying and simply playing with them. However, Shotgun,Sparky and Tourettes state these cases proved difficult to interpret because independent forum timewasters with corroboration was often lacking.
Done here.
2Know's False Memory Syndrome gives a succinct account of technical early clinical motorcycle experiences, and of his theories of repression and the nature of memory. Garry's stated opinion, inferring some of Freud’s early cases should enable 2Know to gain an idea of the roots from which these theories developed, and afford the present writer the opportunity to consider these in some detail.
It will be evident that 2Know knows what follows is not a conventional view. Though 2Know's expositions are critically examined, Nob explained that they are predominantly used as a convenient base for a discussion of his technical claims however his theories of repression and memory in relation to childhood experiences remain deep seated.
Rico and Bay posts open with a brief though vague discussion of the bearing of 2Know's early clinical experiences on current concerns as to the apparent recovery of memories of childhood sexual abuse, mostly in the course of psychotherapy .
However, Batfastard's comment in his post is possibly referenced by Freud’s ideas on memories of early childhood have been considered and his clinical claims at the beginning of his psychoanalytic career have been critically examined.
Before discussing details of Freud’s early case histories in analy retentive motorcycle maintenence, the whole forum addresses “certain misconceptions of 2Know's theories which have been propagated and recycled in the current debates about recovered fine tuning and fettling,” and he by chance selects a passage from Tuonomick's "Searching for a ******* good pint theory" as typifying what he calls “the attempt to assimilate alcohol into the category of ‘recovered memory therapist’ ”
As Keith B reports, Ascorner and Taff write that “Sigmund Freud and Josef Breuer’s classic studies of dysfunctional motorcyclists describes types like 2Know who could not explicitly remember childhood sexual abuse, but experienced disabling fears, nagging anxieties, intrusive thoughts, or disturbing images that reflected implicit memory for the trauma. This has more to do with cleaning and obessively altering parts of toys, rather than enjoying and simply playing with them. However, Shotgun,Sparky and Tourettes state these cases proved difficult to interpret because independent forum timewasters with corroboration was often lacking.
Done here.
Joined Jul 2008
1K Posts | 0+
North Lincolnshire, UK
What happened to that lad you was sawing bits out of his Kawasaki in order to make it lighter, now he was funny.
Would you agree everyone writes about what they know? Someone has 'take apart issues' and now everyone is sexually repressed, we changed the sheets on the bed is a take apart issue? See what I'm saying? What is with all this Signalmount Fraud? You read a few books and now you are a couch anal list is run a **** list is that is; that is your list pal. You might be claiming your own issues as if you assume you know anything about me. Pretty funny, no? You mean the vids? You wish you knew the prop pee gain day is gain a little 1ATMO is me.
Lettuce mix this salad up. To tune the T without pig, we need to gather all those MORE AIR guys. We need to ask if removing the mufflers now need jetting on an FI machine. We are not making more HP, we are running bone stock. Is that twitch more waiting up for you; it sucked it in like it knew.
So, did not the TPS and the 1ATMO, or the 1 amt, or zero, or 1 atmosphere, or 14.7; Slow down the fueling process? It does not look like it to me if that twitch is like a race horse behind a closed gate. We are running in a constant. It means, for every 14.7, there is an opposite and equal 14.7 piss in my eye. That is how I needed to clean my eyes is look down and aim high, fellas. Once you understand the cylinder pressure, we can move on to back pressure. But if you are confused, you better explain why I need a pig and I am heading leaner and meaner.
This is like; 1ATMO 101. I want to ask this question as we get a lot more complicated to bounce back in it's ultimate simplicity. The question is; If we are to remain stock but change that sprocket, are we not adding a few teeth to the rear? Is that like saying, 'you think 1st was something, watch out now for this thing takes off'.... Is that the assumption I have with this sprocket change?
Then, If I do not use pig, did I not create an event that happens faster? Did not the fuel to air ratio need changing or not? Are engines overheating, blowing up, seizing from all these mods with or without pig is ask yourself that. Because it more ripped a fast intake suck with that sprocket change and now the map2 is running richer for some race muffler?
Does that mean we are running map2 on the putt-putt, stop here, wait? Oh, look at that guy on the phone and my buddies smells gas? Is not map2 for "Race Only?" So if I am going to street my bike only, why would I need map2 and load up on the open road not on a closed course? Getting back to that sprocket showing me how it whips up some rpm faster and that 1 atm sure stayed up on the twitch of it all.
Once again, I am not the one confused here if I am pointing out quotes over at the other site if not plenty of websites that have the MORE AIR Camper sleepers. They roll that pile of **** out the back of that hauler with more air and a PC map to hell and back is hell if I know what I'm talking about if we are all gutted with the restrictors and you need to ask yourself if you sustained speed with stock pipes stock map, could you remain in the same fuel constant if you swapped out the pipe to open meg?
If there is a suck sensor off the throttle body, if there is a 1 atm sensor to know what height your eyesight is looking down at the valley, if there was the crank speed sensor to get you there at any speed, are we in the sustained preset fuel trim; no matter the pipe... Sans the [real] gain in hp via pig. This is just air ratio, screw the fuel ratio, this is FI-101.
You need to be on the same page as if sigmond freud had a theory in the absolute. He is nothing more than guess work is a MORE Air kind of guy. So, his theory holds his own prick in his hand is some guy with 3 wives and still has porn in the house kind of figure that guy out. This is tune up , not sink the bizmark.
Lettuce mix this salad up. To tune the T without pig, we need to gather all those MORE AIR guys. We need to ask if removing the mufflers now need jetting on an FI machine. We are not making more HP, we are running bone stock. Is that twitch more waiting up for you; it sucked it in like it knew.
So, did not the TPS and the 1ATMO, or the 1 amt, or zero, or 1 atmosphere, or 14.7; Slow down the fueling process? It does not look like it to me if that twitch is like a race horse behind a closed gate. We are running in a constant. It means, for every 14.7, there is an opposite and equal 14.7 piss in my eye. That is how I needed to clean my eyes is look down and aim high, fellas. Once you understand the cylinder pressure, we can move on to back pressure. But if you are confused, you better explain why I need a pig and I am heading leaner and meaner.
This is like; 1ATMO 101. I want to ask this question as we get a lot more complicated to bounce back in it's ultimate simplicity. The question is; If we are to remain stock but change that sprocket, are we not adding a few teeth to the rear? Is that like saying, 'you think 1st was something, watch out now for this thing takes off'.... Is that the assumption I have with this sprocket change?
Then, If I do not use pig, did I not create an event that happens faster? Did not the fuel to air ratio need changing or not? Are engines overheating, blowing up, seizing from all these mods with or without pig is ask yourself that. Because it more ripped a fast intake suck with that sprocket change and now the map2 is running richer for some race muffler?
Does that mean we are running map2 on the putt-putt, stop here, wait? Oh, look at that guy on the phone and my buddies smells gas? Is not map2 for "Race Only?" So if I am going to street my bike only, why would I need map2 and load up on the open road not on a closed course? Getting back to that sprocket showing me how it whips up some rpm faster and that 1 atm sure stayed up on the twitch of it all.
Once again, I am not the one confused here if I am pointing out quotes over at the other site if not plenty of websites that have the MORE AIR Camper sleepers. They roll that pile of **** out the back of that hauler with more air and a PC map to hell and back is hell if I know what I'm talking about if we are all gutted with the restrictors and you need to ask yourself if you sustained speed with stock pipes stock map, could you remain in the same fuel constant if you swapped out the pipe to open meg?
If there is a suck sensor off the throttle body, if there is a 1 atm sensor to know what height your eyesight is looking down at the valley, if there was the crank speed sensor to get you there at any speed, are we in the sustained preset fuel trim; no matter the pipe... Sans the [real] gain in hp via pig. This is just air ratio, screw the fuel ratio, this is FI-101.
You need to be on the same page as if sigmond freud had a theory in the absolute. He is nothing more than guess work is a MORE Air kind of guy. So, his theory holds his own prick in his hand is some guy with 3 wives and still has porn in the house kind of figure that guy out. This is tune up , not sink the bizmark.
Joined Jul 2008
1K Posts | 0+
North Lincolnshire, UK
You really have absolutely no idea what you are talking about do you?
The V990 stumbles because it is running too lean.
The Map 2 setting "race only" is a get around for emissions legislation, as is the smaller front sprocket. By using them you get the bike the designer wanted you to have, not the tree hugger.
As for FI 101, I suggest you go back to 'grade school' for English.
Removing the mesh on you air filter will make no appreciable difference to the intake volume of air, but when it rains you might find the filter element dragged into the engine.
You remind me of a bloke who dug out his own basement under his house, he didn't need to listen to engineers either, his house collapsed.
I am only wasting the 10 minutes or so to do this reply so that any unfortunate newbie who reads your ill advised drivel gets the message that you don't know what you are writing about.
As with Tifa, that's me done.
The V990 stumbles because it is running too lean.
The Map 2 setting "race only" is a get around for emissions legislation, as is the smaller front sprocket. By using them you get the bike the designer wanted you to have, not the tree hugger.
As for FI 101, I suggest you go back to 'grade school' for English.
Removing the mesh on you air filter will make no appreciable difference to the intake volume of air, but when it rains you might find the filter element dragged into the engine.
You remind me of a bloke who dug out his own basement under his house, he didn't need to listen to engineers either, his house collapsed.
I am only wasting the 10 minutes or so to do this reply so that any unfortunate newbie who reads your ill advised drivel gets the message that you don't know what you are writing about.
As with Tifa, that's me done.
I don't really understand anything written down by you 2know. I quite like your username though but thats all I understand sorry
Yes, but I can back up my studies. I wish I knew this when I was younger. I hope a newbie catches on. I want some hugger as you call it is hug onto a low speed screw and understand why you are going there. I want you to tell me a yes or no question so you are not some hugger tuner.
Since you are going to question my abstract, I have to use your communication called english to explain a simple concept. Why you do not see it, I have no clue. Here are the sentences so I may show a constant 'in the such a way' that the newbie can maybe grasp it. Lets talk about back pressure. I'm going to give the answers, say yes you are wrong, no, you've got it right about back pressure, it sure makes plenty of sense if I ask you to bring in another number for that back pressure as in an absolute number. Bring in your other number. Dummy has his.
Here is the abstract;
What is the pressure in my exhaust pipe with engine off? 14.7 psi is down in that pipe, at the tip of that pipe and all that. Yes is my guess. I bring forward that number or that constant number in or out of the engine. Well, in fact if you want to know a fact or the absolute answer is that with engine off, the cylinder chamber is at the 1ATMO also, engine off yuck-yuck. Pretty constant, don't you think? If it runs that number and for every action there is an equal and opposite number out the pipe... But in a HOT rush it will change the pressure, meaning. I don't want to get too complicated, just the basic principal and then it opens a can of worms.
When the intake valve closes, what is the constant? 14.7 psi is down in that cylinder, it went to a 1 atm event on the close. At idle or WOT, same number in, same number out is that expanded hot bubble you sucked in. This is why they aim for the lamda number being ideal is that constant zero inside the engine on the valve close. Getting way complex now, but say a wave range like 0 to 5v, controls that millisecond kind of mimics the carb electrically. And as the vacuum draws fuel out of a carb, an injector can do it within a degree of a squirt, without getting too complex.
When the hot gas is the low pressure, it pushes out what number in the exhaust pipe? My guess is it pushes out what was once 14.7 psi in the pipe. I believe the MORE air kind of guys need to bring in that other number for the pipe's back pressure and/or engine in the normally aspirated. It was sort of confusing if we are in the abstract working in a reverse engineering kind of how to get to the answers. That put a CLICK in my head; to see if I know a concept about air pressures out the tail pipe. So, my number is 14.7 trying to get back in that exhaust pipe is that number going back in and up. What is your number? Please bring it forward. I think the newbies are waiting.
And now if I do not know what I am talking about, [those that said I do not], bring forward your number too. Plus, backup your abstract so we can be on the same page with the newbie is being me.
You are rushing me into these mods and I have to step back for a moment and take a deep breath and digest it. I'm slow. I'm not the sharpest tool in the wood shed as you have found out. :yes
I will let others decide if I know watt it is 2know. A little knowledge can be ultra dangerous with the right silver solder.
Since you are going to question my abstract, I have to use your communication called english to explain a simple concept. Why you do not see it, I have no clue. Here are the sentences so I may show a constant 'in the such a way' that the newbie can maybe grasp it. Lets talk about back pressure. I'm going to give the answers, say yes you are wrong, no, you've got it right about back pressure, it sure makes plenty of sense if I ask you to bring in another number for that back pressure as in an absolute number. Bring in your other number. Dummy has his.
Here is the abstract;
What is the pressure in my exhaust pipe with engine off? 14.7 psi is down in that pipe, at the tip of that pipe and all that. Yes is my guess. I bring forward that number or that constant number in or out of the engine. Well, in fact if you want to know a fact or the absolute answer is that with engine off, the cylinder chamber is at the 1ATMO also, engine off yuck-yuck. Pretty constant, don't you think? If it runs that number and for every action there is an equal and opposite number out the pipe... But in a HOT rush it will change the pressure, meaning. I don't want to get too complicated, just the basic principal and then it opens a can of worms.
When the intake valve closes, what is the constant? 14.7 psi is down in that cylinder, it went to a 1 atm event on the close. At idle or WOT, same number in, same number out is that expanded hot bubble you sucked in. This is why they aim for the lamda number being ideal is that constant zero inside the engine on the valve close. Getting way complex now, but say a wave range like 0 to 5v, controls that millisecond kind of mimics the carb electrically. And as the vacuum draws fuel out of a carb, an injector can do it within a degree of a squirt, without getting too complex.
When the hot gas is the low pressure, it pushes out what number in the exhaust pipe? My guess is it pushes out what was once 14.7 psi in the pipe. I believe the MORE air kind of guys need to bring in that other number for the pipe's back pressure and/or engine in the normally aspirated. It was sort of confusing if we are in the abstract working in a reverse engineering kind of how to get to the answers. That put a CLICK in my head; to see if I know a concept about air pressures out the tail pipe. So, my number is 14.7 trying to get back in that exhaust pipe is that number going back in and up. What is your number? Please bring it forward. I think the newbies are waiting.
And now if I do not know what I am talking about, [those that said I do not], bring forward your number too. Plus, backup your abstract so we can be on the same page with the newbie is being me.
You are rushing me into these mods and I have to step back for a moment and take a deep breath and digest it. I'm slow. I'm not the sharpest tool in the wood shed as you have found out. :yes
I will let others decide if I know watt it is 2know. A little knowledge can be ultra dangerous with the right silver solder.
Nob... Do you see me outside slapping everyone around? I think I answered a tech question about where to set the rpm. I'm a concept guy for the average joe. Nob, I have a T and tough *****! Too bad I rub you wrong, that happens to be your problem. YOu need a fookin clue. Why, the easiest resolve is to not enter this thread... No mod needed. I will stand in your shoes and blat out for you to be slapped up side the head. Take a pill. Relax. Bring in that number if you have a problem learning the ABC's.
Joined Jun 2011
110 Posts | 0+
Lancashire
Joined Oct 2010
698 Posts | 23+
burnham on sea
Once again, you made the assumption I need to be in some sort of situation with the alpha dog on the board? You have Nob as your alpha? There is always the testosterone tuning someone has to cow down as it were? This is do your thing, report your progress kind of thread. I've read the rules like all the other rules to websites. "Do not harass other members, etc.," you know the drill. I have no time for that sort of trivia. Besides, Nob is a big boy and if he has a problem with that rubber prop, it says you can be all the alpha big dog you want to be, but if there is going to be any slapping, you now know that penis is about to do some dick slapping come get some kind of alpha your signal switching. Shotgun, are you starting trouble? In the end, WATT was the victim; becomes the perp. It will so turn it around on you...
Meanwhile, back in the preparation stages, I'm trying to get my foot in the door for a little product sponsorship. I'm using their product or say, I switched the pig unit from a 4-cylinder to a 2-cylinder. And if we are following, 'half of my brain was talking and now my mouth started moving' as the old lady seems to call it, you are following more, fundamental moves in the generic. I am leaving you a trail of steps to follow. That is, only if you want to follow the abstract to the computer bike fundamental moves so you can tune a computer bike... Any computer bike like a carb bike. Same principal.
I'm just having a hard time trying to explain the complex into how simple this bike really is to tune.
I am speaking more how you understand the computer bike and its simple functions. Anyway, I have a sponsor for anything I need for my testing. I said I needed a new bike to compare what I've found against my older bike of the same brand. Bingo! I'm riding a brand new bike. We dyno my bike and compare it with the new bike.
Yes, I have free access to a dyno for the Tuono or any bike in fact. I found a little HP in a hack. I'm going to apply the same technique to this bike too. One more reason I needed a closed loop bike for testing.
Anyway, I have shown a potential sponsor enough open loop study with their unit. I then asked them a simple, basic, fundamental question as if there are only two ways to go about transferring a 4 cylinder pig to a 2 cylinder pig. The question was asked, 'do I tie both together to make one or drop the two and not use them? Obviously, it was one way to make it work. That again, confirmed how I have to think out the computer bike as in how simple it works.
I will photo shoot how I wire up a computer bike so as not to lose any integrity to the bike's wire harness. This is a CAN system and you do not want to interfere with that signal. Its hard not tamper with it, but that is the way it goes. My wiring might be some old TV show with a, "Me Guy Beer" move to it, but ugly a move as a move can be, it sure does work for me.
Joined Jun 2011
1K Posts | 2+
Near Welshpool
Can we all not just ignore this guy surely he'll find something better to do to ocupy his time eventually.
