well i've sold my monster and now need to decide on which RSV-R to get. budget is up to £5k
it looks like i can get a new shape (i like this ) 2004/5 RSV-R factory, with low miles (under 10 000) for around £4.5-£5k.
or i can get a late 2008 or early 2009 RSV-R (also < 10 000 miles), sometimes with arkas, for around the same price.
which to choose? i'm leaning towards the younger bikes. for a start, i don't think i'd motice or miss not having the lighter wheels and ohlins shock. on the upside, i get a bike that is only 2-3 years old and, possibly, arkas - that's got to be a winning combination.
but the lure of owning a 'factory' is very tempting. but, more often than not, they are on standard cans. also, even with low miles, i'm thinking that on a 5-6 yr old bike, other things wear out.would the shocks or forks need any work?
now i'm really quite torn. i would value any thoughts on this please.
many thanks
it looks like i can get a new shape (i like this ) 2004/5 RSV-R factory, with low miles (under 10 000) for around £4.5-£5k.
or i can get a late 2008 or early 2009 RSV-R (also < 10 000 miles), sometimes with arkas, for around the same price.
which to choose? i'm leaning towards the younger bikes. for a start, i don't think i'd motice or miss not having the lighter wheels and ohlins shock. on the upside, i get a bike that is only 2-3 years old and, possibly, arkas - that's got to be a winning combination.
but the lure of owning a 'factory' is very tempting. but, more often than not, they are on standard cans. also, even with low miles, i'm thinking that on a 5-6 yr old bike, other things wear out.would the shocks or forks need any work?
now i'm really quite torn. i would value any thoughts on this please.
many thanks