This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

going back to yamaha

Joined Jun 2013
180 Posts | 20+
barry south wales uk
oh well i,ve had nearly 3 yrs with the v4 from new,9000 on it now and i must say what a bike...BUT i,m going back to yamaha and the mt 10 yes some say its ugly some say nice.. thats my decision..3 yrs trouble free i must say except clutch cable and belly pan bracket snapping..been great on this forum ,very helpful and good banter ,,who knows may be back in the future ...its been a blast
cheers guys
bash
 
Nice lookin machine mucker, good luck wae it. :thumbup
 
Enjoy the new bike bash, don't be a stranger sign in every now and then to abuse us all
 
Enjoy the new bike bash, don't be a stranger sign in every now and then to get abused

Sorted it for you ^^^

Enjoy the new toy Bash :thumbup

I seriously considered changing over the winter too, but nothing else floats my boat and every time I ride the wee bitch I have the time of my life :cheers

So she is staying till she brakes again then it's divorce time :crazy
 
From Gizmag.com.. sounds like the MT10 is still much higher revving than the V2, and a bit more than the V4.

Hence somewhere between a standard high revving inline 4 and the Tuono V4:


====
... Re. MT10:


In its detuned state, the 998 cc in-line four motor produces no less than 160.4 hp (119.6 kW) at 11,500 rpm, with a gritty maximum torque of 111 Nm (81.9 ft-lbs) at 9,000 rpm. In comparison to the R1, the MT outputs its maximum power values considerably lower in the rev scale. The R1 achieves the 200-hp mark at 13,500 rpm, but in the naked version this kind of power would be nothing short of overkill. Interestingly enough, the maximum torque of the MT is very close to the R1's 112.4 Nm, but being produced 2,500 rpm lower in the MT hints at a pretty muscular midrange torque curve.

This power has to move a mass of 210 kg (463 lb) – oils and full 17-liter (4.5 gal) gas tank included. The MT is slightly longer that its superbike sibling, yet at 1,400 mm (55.12 in) its wheelbase is 5 mm (0,2 in) shorter in comparison.
 
Paul,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,shut the fukkk up ya fanny.
 
Nice lookin machine mucker, good luck wae it. :thumbup

Sorry Aldo! Forgot you just like to look at your machines... with no regard for how they ride! :D. ;)

Mind you, with that much "juice" in you, best just to look! :cheers :thumbup
 
Yer dead right mucker,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,not this weekend though, totally dry and givin it plenty on ma new machine,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, a hope. :thumbup
 
I'm thinking about changing to the MT10 also...much as I love my V4 can't get reliability issues out of my mind!!
 
×

New Posts